Jan den Boon

17 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Jan den Boon
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Rheumatology 513
  • Urology 43
  • Surgery 141
  • Reproductive Medicine 21
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 15
Replace Aparna D. Shah with:
Aparna D. Shah United States
Rebekah G. Fulton United States
R. Mark Ellerkmann United States
Mirjam Weemhoff Netherlands
Naama Marcus-Braun Israel
Kay A. Hoskey United States
Marta Barba Italy
Raquel Martins Arruda Brazil
J.‐M. Yang Taiwan
D. Savary France
Jan den Boon relative to Aparna D. Shah United States Aparna D. Shah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Aparna D. Shah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan den Boon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan den Boon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan den Boon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan den Boon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan den Boon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan den Boon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan den Boon. The network helps show where Jan den Boon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan den Boon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan den Boon Line = papers co-authored together Jan den Boon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2011155
2 2015124
3 201383
4 201155
5 200935
6 201126
7 199920
8 201220
9 201419
10 201116
11 201413
12 200210
13
[Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review].
20118
14 20117
15
SHORT TERM ANATOMICAL RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED NON INFERIORITY TRIAL COMPARING SACROSPINOUS HYSTEROPEXY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF UTERINE PROLAPSE STAGE 2 OR HIGHER.
20134
16
A randomised controlled trial on the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery
20123
17
A multicenter randomized controlled trial on the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery.
20121

About Jan den Boon

Jan den Boon is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Urology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (15 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Hernia repair and management (1 paper), Ureteral procedures and complications (1 paper), Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (513 citations), Urology (43 citations), Surgery (141 citations), Reproductive Medicine (21 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (15 citations). Jan den Boon has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Mark E. Vierhout, Alfredo L. Milani, Harry A.M. Vervest, Renée J. Detollenaere, Mariëlla I. J. Withagen, Kirsten B. Kluivers, Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven, Jelle Stekelenburg, Joanna IntHout and Jan‐Paul W. R. Roovers. Their work appears in journals such as International Urogynecology Journal, BMC Women s Health, Neurourology and Urodynamics, Obstetrics and Gynecology and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact