James Webb

426 citations
16 papers · 312 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Webb

14 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

James Webb
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 185
  • Artificial Intelligence 190
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 8
  • Signal Processing 22
  • Geography, Planning and Development 11
Replace Ruixiao Yao with:
Ruixiao Yao China
Craig Gidney United States
Bibek Pokharel United States
Daan Camps United States
Noureldin Yosri United States
Sayan Das United States
Kristoffer Ottosson United States
Desmond Chik United States
Shelby Kimmel United States
Ben Criger Netherlands
James Webb relative to Ruixiao Yao China Ruixiao Yao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Ruixiao Yao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Webb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Webb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Webb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Webb. The network helps show where James Webb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Webb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Webb Line = papers co-authored together James Webb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2011166
2 197338
3 201024
4 200618
5 201016
6 200613
7 202011
8 200711
9 20105
10 20033
11
Satellite Characterization, Classification, and Operational Assessment Via the Exploitation of Remote Photoacoustic Signatures
20182
12 19732
13 20212
14 20011
15 20190
16 20090

About James Webb

James Webb is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 16 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (3 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (3 papers), Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (2 papers), Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (2 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (2 papers) and Optical Systems and Laser Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (185 citations), Artificial Intelligence (190 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (8 citations), Signal Processing (22 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (11 citations). James Webb has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elanor H. Huntington, Noriyuki Lee, Akira Furusawa, Shuntaro Takeda, Hugo Benichi, Mark M. McKenney, Timothy C. Ralph, C. Robilliard, Michèle Heurs and C. C. Harb. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Science, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques and New Journal of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact