James Warrington

525 citations
29 papers · 355 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James Warrington

27 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

James Warrington
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 109
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
  • Surgery 120
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 38
Replace Sylvia Saalfeld with:
Sylvia Saalfeld Germany
Yingmin Chen China
Sven S. Walter Germany
Tamir Wolf Israel
Jonathan Taylor United Kingdom
Timur Urakov United States
Stéren Chabert Chile
Janus Damm Nybing Denmark
Ronald van ’t Klooster Netherlands
Xiaowei Ding China
James Warrington relative to Sylvia Saalfeld Germany Sylvia Saalfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Sylvia Saalfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Warrington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Warrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Warrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Warrington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Warrington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Warrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Warrington. The network helps show where James Warrington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Warrington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Warrington Line = papers co-authored together James Warrington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201253
2 201745
3 201743
4 201739
5 201836
6 201625
7 200721
8 201512
9 201511
10 199911
11 201711
12 201710
13 20215
14 20214
15 20154
16 20234
17 20184
18 20173
19 20252
20 20232

About James Warrington

James Warrington is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (6 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (109 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (77 citations), Surgery (120 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (38 citations). James Warrington has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Shuo Li, Wufeng Xue, Mark Landis, Stephanie Leung, Martin Charron, Çiğdem Akincioğlu, Jonathan Romsa, William C. Vezina, Heye Zhang and Andrea Lum. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography, NeuroImage Clinical, Open Heart and Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact