James V. Stone

2.6k citations
44 papers · 1.7k · h-index 17

Impact in

    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Blind Source Separation Techniques

Papers in

James V. Stone

43 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

James V. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 821
  • Signal Processing 434
  • Sensory Systems 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
  • Analytical Chemistry 154
Replace Klaus Obermayer with:
Klaus Obermayer Germany
Marc M. Van Hulle Belgium
Tai Sing Lee United States
Fengyu Cong China
Chunqi Chang China
Maneesh Sahani United Kingdom
Richard Kronland-Martinet France
Pietro Berkes United States
Michael S. Lewicki United States
Sebastiano Stramaglia Italy
James V. Stone relative to Klaus Obermayer Germany Klaus Obermayer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Klaus Obermayer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James V. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James V. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James V. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James V. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James V. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James V. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James V. Stone. The network helps show where James V. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James V. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James V. Stone Line = papers co-authored together James V. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002287
2 2004273
3 2001166
4 2001140
5 2002132
6 200483
7 199882
8 200271
9 199666
10 199956
11 199537
12 200229
13 199725
14 200924
15 201121
16 199618
17 199518
18 200116
19 200216
20 201515

About James V. Stone

James V. Stone is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing and Social Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (7 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (6 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers), Color Science and Applications (3 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (821 citations), Signal Processing (434 citations), Sensory Systems (102 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (218 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (154 citations). James V. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include John Porrill, Paul Dean, Noah Porter, Iain D. Wilkinson, Nicola M. Hunkin, R. Kevin Wood, Michael Port, Rolf Kötter, Stephen Isard and Stuart P. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Perception, Neural Computation, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Vision Research and PLoS Computational Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact