James Todd
Impact in
- Horticulture top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
- Genetics and Plant Breeding
Papers in
-
- Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing 37
- Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement 11
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 10
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 3
- Surgery 18
- Natural Products and Biological Research 18
- Co-authors
- Jianping Wang (9 shared papers)Xiping Yang (6 shared papers)William M. Schaffer (1 shared paper)M. Valentine Schaffer (1 shared paper)Deborah B. Jensen (1 shared paper)Jessica Gurevitch (1 shared paper)Sushma Sood (7 shared papers)Ziliang Luo (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (4 papers)Agronomy (3 papers)The Plant Genome (3 papers)Crop Science (2 papers)Bragantia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaBrazil
In The Last Decade
James Todd
41 papers receiving 615 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Horticulture 39
- Plant Science 527
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 139
- Insect Science 79
- Surgery 182
Countries citing papers authored by James Todd
This map shows the geographic impact of James Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Todd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Todd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Todd. The network helps show where James Todd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Todd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1979 | 145 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 9 |
About James Todd
James Todd is a scholar working on Plant Science, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Agronomy and Crop Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (37 papers), Natural Products and Biological Research (18 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (18 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (11 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (10 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (3 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (39 citations), Plant Science (527 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (139 citations), Insect Science (79 citations) and Surgery (182 citations). James Todd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Jianping Wang, Xiping Yang, William M. Schaffer, M. Valentine Schaffer, Deborah B. Jensen, Jessica Gurevitch, Sushma Sood, Ziliang Luo, Anna L. Hale and B. Glaz. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Agronomy, The Plant Genome, Crop Science and Bragantia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.