James Stankiewicz

26 papers receiving 940 citations

Peers

James Stankiewicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 584
  • Neurology 253
  • Neurology 88
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 221
  • Rheumatology 143
Replace Channa Kolb with:
Channa Kolb United States
Jacqueline Durfee United States
Robert Glanzman United States
Suzanne Gazda United States
Siegrid Strasser‐Fuchs Austria
Claire Hirst United Kingdom
Eva Strijbis Netherlands
R. Egg Austria
Gina Remington United States
David Brassat France
James Stankiewicz relative to Channa Kolb United States Channa Kolb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Channa Kolb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Stankiewicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Stankiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Stankiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Stankiewicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Stankiewicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Stankiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Stankiewicz. The network helps show where James Stankiewicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Stankiewicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Stankiewicz Line = papers co-authored together James Stankiewicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007244
2 200990
3 201179
4 200961
5 200954
6 202054
7 201954
8 200840
9 201139
10 201639
11 201636
12 201227
13 202326
14 200922
15 201420
16 201716
17 201813
18 20199
19 20209
20 20225

About James Stankiewicz

James Stankiewicz is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Oncology, Rheumatology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 27 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (21 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (10 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (8 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (4 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (2 papers) and Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (584 citations), Neurology (253 citations), Neurology (88 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (221 citations) and Rheumatology (143 citations). James Stankiewicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rohit Bakshi, Ashish Arora, Mohit Neema, Howard L. Weiner, S. Scott Panter, Courtney E. Batt, Brian C. Healy, Charles R.G. Guttmann, Guy J. Buckle and Maria K. Houtchens. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, Neurotherapeutics, Neurology and Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact