James Stankiewicz

1.3k citations
29 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

James Stankiewicz

28 papers receiving 984 citations

Peers

James Stankiewicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 562
  • Neurology 168
  • Neurology 75
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 130
  • Rheumatology 76
Replace Channa Kolb with:
Channa Kolb United States
Gina Remington United States
Jacqueline Durfee United States
Giacomo Lus Italy
Timo Uphaus Germany
P. O’Connor Canada
Francisco Pérez‐Miralles Spain
Rana Zabad United States
CH Polman Netherlands
Hadar Kolb Israel
James Stankiewicz relative to Channa Kolb United States Channa Kolb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Channa Kolb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Stankiewicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Stankiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Stankiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Stankiewicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Stankiewicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Stankiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Stankiewicz. The network helps show where James Stankiewicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Stankiewicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Stankiewicz Line = papers co-authored together James Stankiewicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007256
2 200994
3 201181
4 200966
5 201957
6 200955
7 202054
8 200843
9 201641
10 201140
11 201636
12 201230
13 202328
14 200923
15 201420
16 201717
17 201813
18 20209
19 20199
20 20226

About James Stankiewicz

James Stankiewicz is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Oncology, Rheumatology and Hematology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (20 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (6 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (4 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (2 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (1 paper), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper) and Iron Metabolism and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (562 citations), Neurology (168 citations), Neurology (75 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (130 citations) and Rheumatology (76 citations). James Stankiewicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rohit Bakshi, Ashish Arora, Mohit Neema, Howard L. Weiner, S. Scott Panter, Courtney E. Batt, Brian C. Healy, Guy J. Buckle, Charles R.G. Guttmann and Tanuja Chitnis. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact