James Shaffer

595 citations
26 papers · 498 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

James Shaffer

26 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

James Shaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Condensed Matter Physics 223
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 278
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 37
  • Materials Chemistry 231
  • Ceramics and Composites 16
Replace G. V. Kozlov with:
G. V. Kozlov Russia
J. Primot France
N. Motohira Japan
H. U. Åström Sweden
S. Gnanarajan Australia
O. D. Dosser United Kingdom
Toshiyuki Aida Japan
A. Bartos Germany
Shiro Takeno Japan
J. S. Horwitz United States
James Shaffer relative to G. V. Kozlov Russia G. V. Kozlov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
G. V. Kozlov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Shaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Shaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Shaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Shaffer. The network helps show where James Shaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Shaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Shaffer Line = papers co-authored together James Shaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999185
2 199876
3 196655
4 197032
5 202429
6 197219
7 197218
8 197218
9 200213
10 197411
11 20239
12 19736
13 19715
14 19735
15 19723
16 20212
17 19652
18 19772
19 20241
20 20211

About James Shaffer

James Shaffer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (7 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (6 papers), Phase-change materials and chalcogenides (6 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (5 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (5 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (4 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (223 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (278 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (37 citations), Materials Chemistry (231 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (16 citations). James Shaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Jorgensen, P. W. Klamut, B. Dąbrowski, Xiao‐Feng Xiong, Ray Dybzinski, C. W. Kimball, O. Chmaissem, Joan Siewenie, S. Short and Z. Bukowski. Their work appears in journals such as physica status solidi (b), Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact