James Pretzer
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision
Papers in
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 2
- Emotional Intelligence and Performance 1
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 3
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 1
- Co-authors
- Barbara Fleming (4 shared papers)A. J. Freeman (1 shared paper)Norman B. Epstein (2 shared papers)Karen M. Simon (1 shared paper)Arthur Freeman (1 shared paper)Cory F. Newman (1 shared paper)Aaron T. Beck (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (1 paper)Behavior Therapy (1 paper)Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Pretzer
7 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Clinical Psychology 167
- Social Psychology 123
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- General Psychology 4
- Demography 30
Countries citing papers authored by James Pretzer
This map shows the geographic impact of James Pretzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pretzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pretzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Pretzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pretzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pretzer. The network helps show where James Pretzer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside James Pretzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 129 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 2 |
About James Pretzer
James Pretzer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 7 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (167 citations), Social Psychology (123 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations), General Psychology (4 citations) and Demography (30 citations). James Pretzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Fleming, A. J. Freeman, Norman B. Epstein, Karen M. Simon, Arthur Freeman, Cory F. Newman and Aaron T. Beck. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Behavior Therapy and Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.