James Pond

1.3k citations
50 papers · 1.0k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Pond

48 papers receiving 987 citations

Peers

James Pond
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 296
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 107
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 334
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 600
  • Biomedical Engineering 391
Replace Thorsten Feichtner with:
Thorsten Feichtner Germany
Martin Esmann Germany
Aude L. Lereu France
J. Kim South Korea
Oussama Mahboub France
Sachin Kasture India
Peter R. Wiecha France
Xuezhi Zheng Belgium
Randy X. Bian United States
James Pond relative to Thorsten Feichtner Germany Thorsten Feichtner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Thorsten Feichtner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pond. The network helps show where James Pond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pond Line = papers co-authored together James Pond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009184
2 2017164
3 2016116
4 201497
5 200871
6 201262
7 200742
8 201433
9 200931
10 201025
11 200722
12 201419
13 201619
14 201712
15 201011
16 201610
17 20089
18 20169
19 20169
20 20178

About James Pond

James Pond is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (30 papers), Optical Network Technologies (13 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (13 papers), Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (12 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (10 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (6 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (6 papers) and Digital Holography and Microscopy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (296 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (107 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (334 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (600 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (391 citations). James Pond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen K. Gray, Joseph R. Lakowicz, Mustafa Habib Chowdhury, Lukas Chrostowski, Jonas Flueckiger, Xu Wang, Krishanu Ray, Amy Liu, Jackson Klein and Zeqin Lu. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Journal of Biophotonics and Physical review. A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact