James Pearson

56 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

James Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Rehabilitation 134
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 93
  • Physiology 432
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 114
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 190
Replace T. Morimoto with:
T. Morimoto Japan
S. K. Hong South Korea
T. H. Benzinger United States
Masaaki Hashimoto Japan
F. Bellemare Canada
Hiroshi Nosé Japan
Hideaki Nakayama Japan
Mark J. Patterson Australia
Eiji Okada Japan
Takeshi Sugiura Japan
James Pearson relative to T. Morimoto Japan T. Morimoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
T. Morimoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pearson. The network helps show where James Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pearson Line = papers co-authored together James Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002123
2 2010119
3 200374
4 201156
5 201055
6 201252
7 197151
8 200645
9 201040
10 196838
11 201534
12 201334
13 201233
14 201732
15 201231
16 201129
17 201527
18 201325
19 200225
20 196525

About James Pearson

James Pearson is a scholar working on Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermoregulation and physiological responses (19 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (10 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (10 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (6 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (4 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (4 papers) and Infrared Thermography in Medicine (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (134 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (93 citations), Physiology (432 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (114 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (190 citations). James Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Craig G. Crandall, Rebekah A. I. Lucas, José González‐Alonso, Donald D. Sauser, Matthew S. Ganio, Horace Barker, Eric J. Stöhr, Leena Ali, Zachary J. Schlader and David A. Low. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact