James Osborn

111 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

James Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 772
  • Instrumentation 70
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 205
  • Condensed Matter Physics 114
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 557
Replace Brian J. Thompson with:
Brian J. Thompson United States
Haïda Liang United Kingdom
L. O. Heflinger United States
Kenrō Miyamoto Japan
Yulei Bai United States
Xizheng Ke China
Morley M. Blouke United States
John H. Bruning United States
A. Belafhal Morocco
Shiang‐Yu Wang Taiwan
James Osborn relative to Brian J. Thompson United States Brian J. Thompson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Brian J. Thompson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Osborn. The network helps show where James Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Osborn Line = papers co-authored together James Osborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198989
2 201370
3 201864
4 201451
5 202144
6 201243
7 201242
8 201542
9 200238
10 201838
11 201236
12 201032
13 201222
14 201422
15 202022
16 198822
17 200221
18 201719
19 202019
20 201619

About James Osborn

James Osborn is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 124 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (87 papers), Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (39 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (30 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (22 papers), Advanced optical system design (18 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (17 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (7 papers) and Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (772 citations), Instrumentation (70 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (205 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (114 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (557 citations). James Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Wilson, T. Butterley, M. Sarazin, Matthew J. Townson, Tim Morris, V. S. Dhillon, Andrés Guesalaga, Dani Guzmán, Wen Liang and K. A. H. Mirza. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Optics Express, Applied Optics, Physica C Superconductivity and Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact