James Osborn

104 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 710
  • Instrumentation 62
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 200
  • Condensed Matter Physics 107
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 516
Replace Haïda Liang with:
Haïda Liang United Kingdom
Walter J. Wild United States
Brian J. Thompson United States
L. O. Heflinger United States
Morley M. Blouke United States
Kenrō Miyamoto Japan
John H. Bruning United States
A. Belafhal Morocco
Michael Čada Canada
Sheng‐Cai Shi China
James Osborn relative to Haïda Liang United Kingdom Haïda Liang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.9×
Haïda Liang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Osborn. The network helps show where James Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Osborn Line = papers co-authored together James Osborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198983
2 201367
3 201862
4 201242
5 202142
6 201540
7 201440
8 200238
9 201836
10 201232
11 201030
12 201225
13 201222
14 202021
15 198821
16 201420
17 200220
18 202019
19 201618
20 201716

About James Osborn

James Osborn is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 120 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (83 papers), Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (38 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (29 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (22 papers), Advanced optical system design (18 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (15 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (7 papers) and Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (710 citations), Instrumentation (62 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (200 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (107 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (516 citations). James Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Wilson, T. Butterley, M. Sarazin, Matthew J. Townson, Tim Morris, V. S. Dhillon, Andrés Guesalaga, Dani Guzmán, J. W. Loram and Wen Liang. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Optics Express, Applied Optics, Sensors and Physica C Superconductivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact