James Monaco

1.0k citations
38 papers · 841 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

James Monaco

37 papers receiving 817 citations

Peers

James Monaco
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Biophysics 125
  • Health Informatics 21
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 339
  • Artificial Intelligence 523
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 218
Replace André Homeyer with:
André Homeyer Germany
Navid Farahani United States
Monjoy Saha United States
Daniel Heim Germany
Oscar Geessink Netherlands
Akif Burak Tosun United States
Żaneta Świderska-Chadaj Poland
Ozan Ciga Canada
Chetan L. Srinidhi India
James Monaco relative to André Homeyer Germany André Homeyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
André Homeyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Monaco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Monaco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Monaco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Monaco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Monaco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Monaco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Monaco. The network helps show where James Monaco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Monaco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Monaco Line = papers co-authored together James Monaco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009226
2 201099
3 201162
4 201156
5 200936
6 201033
7 200930
8 201226
9 201224
10 201021
11 201116
12 202015
13 201115
14 201214
15 201213
16 201812
17 200912
18 201012
19 201211
20 200811

About James Monaco

James Monaco is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Media Technology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (17 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (10 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (4 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (4 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (3 papers) and Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (125 citations), Health Informatics (21 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (339 citations), Artificial Intelligence (523 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (218 citations). James Monaco has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anant Madabhushi, Michael D. Feldman, Ajay Basavanhally, Shridar Ganesan, Gyan Bhanot, Shannon C. Agner, J E Tomaszewski, Scott Doyle, John Tomaszewski and Ulysses J. Balis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pathology Informatics, Analytical Cellular Pathology, Medical Image Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact