James Monaco

940 citations
30 papers · 792 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Monaco

30 papers receiving 777 citations

Peers

James Monaco
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Artificial Intelligence 543
  • Health Informatics 24
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 151
  • Biophysics 43
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 86
Replace Sonal Kothari with:
Sonal Kothari United States
Nadia Brancati Italy
Wouter Bulten Netherlands
Péter Bándi Netherlands
Żaneta Świderska-Chadaj Poland
Ozan Ciga Canada
Xinliang Zhu United States
Sebastian Otálora Switzerland
Noorul Wahab United Kingdom
Monjoy Saha United States
James Monaco relative to Sonal Kothari United States Sonal Kothari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Sonal Kothari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Monaco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Monaco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Monaco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Monaco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Monaco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Monaco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Monaco. The network helps show where James Monaco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Monaco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Monaco Line = papers co-authored together James Monaco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009229
2 201099
3 201163
4 201157
5 200936
6 201034
7 200930
8 201226
9 201224
10 201022
11 201116
12 201115
13 201214
14 201213
15 200912
16 201012
17 201812
18 200211
19 200811
20 20119

About James Monaco

James Monaco is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biophysics, Health Informatics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 30 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (18 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (7 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers), Color Science and Applications (1 paper) and Research Data Management Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (543 citations), Health Informatics (24 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (151 citations), Biophysics (43 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (86 citations). James Monaco has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anant Madabhushi, Michael D. Feldman, John Tomaszewski, Ajay N. Basavanhally, Gyan Bhanot, Shridar Ganesan, Shannon C. Agner, J E Tomaszewski, Scott T. Doyle and Ulysses J. Balis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pathology Informatics, Medical Image Analysis, Analytical Cellular Pathology, BMC Bioinformatics and International Journal of Computer Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact