James L. Everett

56 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

James L. Everett
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 353
  • Neurology 142
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 238
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 217
  • Physiology 302
Replace Richard B. Miller with:
Richard B. Miller United States
Cordula Nitsch Germany
Yan Zhou China
Susan Adele Greenfield United Kingdom
Jacqueline Hayes United Kingdom
John S. Penn United States
Michael J. Devine United Kingdom
Irina Abakumova Russia
Susan L. Campbell United States
William R. Woodward United States
James L. Everett relative to Richard B. Miller United States Richard B. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Richard B. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Everett. The network helps show where James L. Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James L. Everett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James L. Everett Line = papers co-authored together James L. Everett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017144
2 2014127
3 2018103
4 1953102
5
Performance of patients with schizophrenia on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST).
200198
6 199285
7 198577
8 202170
9 198965
10 201461
11 199760
12 198555
13 200355
14 201953
15 199053
16 198648
17 199647
18 202045
19 197639
20 197229

About James L. Everett

James L. Everett is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Communication and Physiology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trace Elements in Health (11 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (353 citations), Neurology (142 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (238 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (217 citations) and Physiology (302 citations). James L. Everett has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Neil D. Telling, Joanna F. Collingwood, Louis Laplante, Jon Dobson, Walter C. J. Ross, Jake Brooks, Gerrit van der Laan, John J. Roberts, Alain Morin and Frederik Lermyte. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Public Relations Review, Experimental Brain Research, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology and Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact