James K. Hoffer

41 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

James K. Hoffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 259
  • Geophysics 198
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 323
  • Radiation 56
  • Condensed Matter Physics 51
Replace V. Ya. Ternovoǐ with:
V. Ya. Ternovoǐ Russia
A. Decoster France
R. P. Godwin United States
B.J.B. Crowley United Kingdom
J.F. Benage United States
E. R. Mapoles United States
M. V. Zhernokletov Russia
D. A. Chapman United Kingdom
А. Л. Михайлов Russia
C. H. Aldrich United States
James K. Hoffer relative to V. Ya. Ternovoǐ Russia V. Ya. Ternovoǐ's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
V. Ya. Ternovoǐ · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James K. Hoffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James K. Hoffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James K. Hoffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James K. Hoffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James K. Hoffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James K. Hoffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James K. Hoffer. The network helps show where James K. Hoffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James K. Hoffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James K. Hoffer Line = papers co-authored together James K. Hoffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998114
2 198899
3 197082
4 197356
5 197634
6 196824
7 198023
8 199620
9 198919
10 198617
11 197911
12 197310
13 19989
14 20069
15 19837
16 19866
17 20086
18 19966
19 19685
20
Forming a ``perfectly`` uniform shell of solid DT fusion fuel by the beta-layering process
19925

About James K. Hoffer

James K. Hoffer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Geophysics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fusion materials and technologies (14 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (13 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (11 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (259 citations), Geophysics (198 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (323 citations), Radiation (56 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (51 citations). James K. Hoffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Larry R. Foreman, W. R. Gardner, N. E. Phillips, Norman E. Phillips, Dipen N. Sinha, J. Sánchez, L. J. Campbell, E. R. Mapoles, R. J. Bartlett and Fritz J. Swenson. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Science & Technology, Physical Review Letters, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Low Temperature Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact