James Good

497 citations
31 papers · 231 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Good

23 papers receiving 209 citations

Peers

James Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 68
  • Structural Biology 4
  • Family Practice 5
  • Aerospace Engineering 45
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 41
Replace K.J. Thomas with:
K.J. Thomas United Kingdom
John Dobbins United States
M. Große Perdekamp Germany
Takashi Noguchi Japan
Bamidele O. Awojoyogbe Nigeria
J.P. Corley United States
A. de Castro Spain
J. Cheng United States
Z. Segalov United States
Ning Guo China
James Good relative to K.J. Thomas United Kingdom K.J. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
K.J. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Good. The network helps show where James Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Good Line = papers co-authored together James Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197150
2 200448
3 195937
4 201923
5 20069
6 20189
7 20138
8 20217
9 20186
10 20225
11 20155
12 20194
13 20094
14
Evaluation of ARCAM Deposited Ti-6Al-4V
20083
15 20232
16 20172
17 20172
18 20221
19 20211
20 20191

About James Good

James Good is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (12 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (10 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (6 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (4 papers), Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (3 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (3 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (68 citations), Structural Biology (4 citations), Family Practice (5 citations), Aerospace Engineering (45 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (41 citations). James Good has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include F. Stephan, Mitra Noroozian, Perry G. Pernicano, Stephanie K. Patterson, A. Oppelt, Smita Patel, Elaine M. Caoili, David A. Jamadar, Yves Rénier and Qian Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, Photonics and Radiotherapy and Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact