James E. Sanders

106 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

James E. Sanders
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Religious studies 594
  • Archeology 398
  • Microbiology 160
  • Immunology 454
  • Endocrinology 110
Replace Peter Metcalf with:
Peter Metcalf United States
Leonor Gusmão Portugal
Vicente M. Cabrera Spain
Luı́sa Pereira Portugal
David W. Anthony United States
Enrico Cappellini Denmark
J. Víctor Moreno-Mayar Denmark
Richard Villems Estonia
Anne Hudson United Kingdom
Luca Ermini United Kingdom
James E. Sanders relative to Peter Metcalf United States Peter Metcalf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17.0×
Peter Metcalf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Sanders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Sanders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Sanders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Sanders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Sanders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Sanders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Sanders. The network helps show where James E. Sanders may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Sanders, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Sanders Line = papers co-authored together James E. Sanders links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981208
2 1979160
3 1980136
4 2006107
5 197575
6 197865
7 197756
8 197850
9
From Sacred Story to Sacred Text: Canon as Paradigm
198748
10 196948
11
The Leningrad Codex : a facsimile edition
199847
12 200443
13 198338
14 197535
15 197935
16 199735
17
The Dead Sea Psalms scroll
196733
18 199232
19 197129
20 198327

About James E. Sanders

James E. Sanders is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 134 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (42 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (23 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (20 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (11 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (9 papers), Myxozoan Parasites in Aquatic Species (8 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (8 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (594 citations), Archeology (398 citations), Microbiology (160 citations), Immunology (454 citations) and Endocrinology (110 citations). James E. Sanders has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. L. Fryer, David M. Carr, K. Stephen Pilcher, Matthew P. Black, John R. Beverley, Takashi Yamamoto, Richard A. Holt, Craig Andrew Evans, K. A. JOHNSON and J. S. Rohovec. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture, Hispanic American Historical Review, Journal of Fish Diseases and Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact