James E. Millerd

1.6k citations
48 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Millerd

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James E. Millerd
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 687
  • Media Technology 238
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 672
  • Instrumentation 58
  • Computational Mechanics 168
Replace Tomoaki Eiju with:
Tomoaki Eiju Japan
Neal Brock United States
John Hayes United States
Norbert Lindlein Germany
Konstantinos Falaggis Poland
L. Deck United States
Stefan Sinzinger Germany
Joseph J. M. Braat Netherlands
Zhishan Gao China
Gary E. Sommargren United States
James E. Millerd relative to Tomoaki Eiju Japan Tomoaki Eiju's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tomoaki Eiju · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Millerd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Millerd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Millerd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Millerd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Millerd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Millerd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Millerd. The network helps show where James E. Millerd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Millerd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Millerd Line = papers co-authored together James E. Millerd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004270
2 2005201
3 1990107
4 200554
5 200654
6 200538
7 199236
8 200534
9 201130
10 199930
11 200426
12 200426
13 200425
14 201423
15 199021
16 201520
17 199219
18 201016
19 199516
20 199016

About James E. Millerd

James E. Millerd is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical measurement and interference techniques (23 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (17 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (11 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (10 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (10 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (7 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (6 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (687 citations), Media Technology (238 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (672 citations), Instrumentation (58 citations) and Computational Mechanics (168 citations). James E. Millerd has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Neal Brock, John Hayes, James C. Wyant, Michael North-Morris, Matt Novak, Marvin B. Klein, E. Garmire, Afshin Partovi, Sudhir Trivedi and William H. Steier. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Experiments in Fluids and 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact