James E. King

157 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

James E. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
  • Social Psychology 1.6k
  • Developmental Biology 160
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 910
  • Small Animals 418
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 155
Replace Gerhard Lenski with:
Gerhard Lenski United States
Stephanie D. Preston United States
Celia Moore United States
Lee Ellis United States
Leonard Green United States
Dominic Johnson United Kingdom
Martin Daly Canada
Michael Gurven United States
Sarah F. Brosnan United States
John Archer United Kingdom
James E. King relative to Gerhard Lenski United States Gerhard Lenski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gerhard Lenski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. King. The network helps show where James E. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. King Line = papers co-authored together James E. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997303
2 2004187
3 2003176
4 2006165
5 1981156
6 2000126
7 2009124
8 2000113
9 2003113
10 200299
11 200499
12 200298
13 200795
14 200594
15 197392
16 200891
17 201090
18 200890
19 200586
20 201281

About James E. King

James E. King is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Plant Science, having authored 167 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (34 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (19 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (18 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (15 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (9 papers) and Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.6k citations), Developmental Biology (160 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (910 citations), Small Animals (418 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (155 citations). James E. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Weiß, Aurelio José Figueredo, Ian O. Williamson, Martha R. Crowther, David P. Lepak, R. M. Enns, Lori Perkins, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Miho Inoue‐Murayama and Thomas R. Van Devender. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Primatology, Journal of comparative psychology, Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion, Journal of Economic Entomology and Physiology & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact