James E. Elliott

544 citations
30 papers · 288 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Elliott

24 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

James E. Elliott
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Emergency Medical Services 130
  • Nephrology 66
  • Geophysics 75
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 113
  • Artificial Intelligence 73
Replace Ahmed Khalil with:
Ahmed Khalil Egypt
Elisa Poggianti Italy
Elissaios Kontis Greece
Madan Lal Sharma India
J. N. Baldwin United States
Xian-sheng Cheng China
Rachel C. W. Whitty United Kingdom
Marianne Lafitte France
Anil Patwardhan India
Robert Giusti United States
James E. Elliott relative to Ahmed Khalil Egypt Ahmed Khalil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Ahmed Khalil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Elliott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Elliott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Elliott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Elliott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Elliott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Elliott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Elliott. The network helps show where James E. Elliott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Elliott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Elliott Line = papers co-authored together James E. Elliott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003134
2 196927
3 202119
4 198517
5 198315
6 199314
7 199511
8 198310
9 19966
10 20074
11 20213
12 19933
13 19933
14 20232
15 20222
16 19682
17 19852
18 20192
19 19962
20 20062

About James E. Elliott

James E. Elliott is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Geophysics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Mechanics of Materials and Archeology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (11 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (11 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (4 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (3 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (3 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (2 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (130 citations), Nephrology (66 citations), Geophysics (75 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (113 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (73 citations). James E. Elliott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Churchill, Robert M. Lindsay, Stewart Kribs, Louise Moist, Andrew A. House, Steven F. Millward, John D. Wells, Richard H. Sillitoe, Beverly Snaith and N. Woznitza. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geology, Nuclear Medicine Communications, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Internet Archaeology and Current Problems in Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact