James E. Davia

1.3k citations
30 papers · 901 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Davia

29 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers

James E. Davia
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 567
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 350
  • Epidemiology 272
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 23
  • Applied Psychology 31
Replace David Cloutier with:
David Cloutier United States
Danijela Trifunović Serbia
Benjamin M. Kaplan United States
Kunihiro Kinjo Japan
Antônio Carlos C. Carvalho Brazil
H Dénolin Belgium
Tsuey‐Yuan Huang Taiwan
Jobst B. Winter Netherlands
Paweł Kuca Poland
Maria Pia Calabrò Italy
James E. Davia relative to David Cloutier United States David Cloutier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
David Cloutier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Davia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Davia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Davia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Davia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Davia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Davia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Davia. The network helps show where James E. Davia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Davia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Davia Line = papers co-authored together James E. Davia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977161
2 197778
3 197965
4 198164
5 197554
6 198244
7 197443
8 197041
9 198035
10 197335
11 198233
12 198330
13 198229
14 198126
15 197821
16 198120
17 197618
18 198416
19 197414
20 197713

About James E. Davia

James E. Davia is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (4 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (567 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (350 citations), Epidemiology (272 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (23 citations) and Applied Psychology (31 citations). James E. Davia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Somalia. Frequent co-authors include Melvin D. Cheitlin, Carlos M. DeCastro, John J. Fenoglio, Hugh A. McAllister, David S. Krantz, Patrick K.C. Chun, Sol I. Rajfer, Marcus Schaaf, Robert C. Smallridge and Richard T. Shaffer. Their work appears in journals such as American Heart Journal, CHEST Journal, The American Journal of Cardiology, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact