James Colley

25 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

James Colley
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Human-Computer Interaction 248
  • Computer Science Applications 82
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 49
  • Demography 53
  • Information Systems and Management 30
Replace Timo Jakobi with:
Timo Jakobi Germany
Mike Harding United Kingdom
Veikko Ikonen Finland
Johanna Ylipulli Finland
Milene Selbach Silveira Brazil
Lachlan Urquhart United Kingdom
Marta Lárusdóttir Iceland
Connor Graham Australia
Christian Stary Austria
Karl Werder Germany
James Colley relative to Timo Jakobi Germany Timo Jakobi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Timo Jakobi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Colley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Colley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Colley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Colley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Colley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Colley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Colley. The network helps show where James Colley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Colley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Colley Line = papers co-authored together James Colley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201686
2 201476
3 201854
4 201649
5 201649
6 201739
7 201636
8 201831
9 201025
10 201421
11 201419
12 201619
13 201915
14 20195
15 20175
16
Experiencing the Future Mundane
20185
17 20165
18 20165
19 20174
20 20184

About James Colley

James Colley is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (8 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (7 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (7 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (5 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (2 papers) and ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (248 citations), Computer Science Applications (82 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (49 citations), Demography (53 citations) and Information Systems and Management (30 citations). James Colley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Joel E. Fischer, Enrico Costanza, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, Ewa Luger, Peter Tolmie, Tom Lodge, Richard Mortier and Chris Greenhalgh. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management and Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact