James B. Forrest

2.5k citations
57 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James B. Forrest

54 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

James B. Forrest
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 208
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 374
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 356
  • Surgery 477
  • Developmental Neuroscience 38
Replace Adam Tucker with:
Adam Tucker United States
J. F. Nunn United Kingdom
Toru Komatsu Japan
B. Biber Sweden
Anthony J. Cunningham Ireland
Harry Wollman United States
N.S. Assali United States
Makoto Tanaka Japan
W. N. Stainsby United States
J.P. DESBOROUGH United Kingdom
James B. Forrest relative to Adam Tucker United States Adam Tucker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Adam Tucker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James B. Forrest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James B. Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James B. Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James B. Forrest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James B. Forrest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James B. Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James B. Forrest. The network helps show where James B. Forrest may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James B. Forrest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James B. Forrest Line = papers co-authored together James B. Forrest links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992227
2 2002141
3 1984121
4 1980119
5 1993115
6 199191
7 198882
8 198862
9 197052
10 198243
11 198442
12 198035
13 198534
14 197532
15 198930
16 198027
17 197224
18 197817
19 198316
20 197616

About James B. Forrest

James B. Forrest is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Physiology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (10 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (6 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (5 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (4 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (208 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (374 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (356 citations), Surgery (477 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (38 citations). James B. Forrest has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Norman Buckley, Robert M.K.W. Lee, Michael T. Newhouse, Kai Rehder, Charles H. Goldsmith, Michael K. Cahalan, John S. Smeda, R M Lee, Carol M. Rossman and W. Scott Beattie. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Microscopy and Circulation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact