James Armstrong

19 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

James Armstrong
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 87
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 29
  • Urology 19
  • Demography 39
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
Replace Patrícia Renovato Tobo with:
Patrícia Renovato Tobo Brazil
Rudolf F. Vollman
Giuseppe Quatrosi Italy
Ana Paula Abreu United States
S. Walker United Kingdom
Kelsey Hudson United States
Alexandre A. Lussier United States
Robert Masson United States
Helle Rexbye Denmark
Erik Wibowo New Zealand
James Armstrong relative to Patrícia Renovato Tobo Brazil Patrícia Renovato Tobo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Patrícia Renovato Tobo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Armstrong. The network helps show where James Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside James Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Armstrong Line = papers co-authored together James Armstrong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Immigration to Israel: Sociological Perspectives
200170
2 197446
3 197539
4 201635
5 200729
6 201024
7 201419
8 201018
9 200615
10 201410
11 20199
12 19928
13 19696
14 20082
15 19932
16 20222
17 20071
18 20091
19 20211
20
Shelley's Unsung Muse: Eliza O'Neill and the Inspiration Behind The Cenci
20150

About James Armstrong

James Armstrong is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Urology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (87 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (29 citations), Urology (19 citations), Demography (39 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations). James Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles H. Hubscher, Colin Martindale, Marilyn L.F. Estep, Richard D. Johnson, Susan J. Harkema, April N. Herrity, William Reed, Daya S. Gupta, Stephen M. Onifer and Darlene A. Burke. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Ethnohistory, Journal of Neurotrauma, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology and The Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact