Jaime Kigel

6.9k citations
115 papers · 4.2k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Jaime Kigel

113 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Jaime Kigel
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.6k
  • Forestry 402
  • Plant Science 2.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 988
  • Ecological Modeling 217
Replace José M. Facelli with:
José M. Facelli Australia
Pieter Poot Australia
Per Milberg Sweden
Mónica B. Bertiller Argentina
Zdravko Baruch Venezuela
Jasmin Joshi Germany
Jeremy J. James United States
Joseph M. DiTomaso United States
Jitka Klimešová Czechia
Enrique J. Chaneton Argentina
Jaime Kigel relative to José M. Facelli Australia José M. Facelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
José M. Facelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime Kigel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime Kigel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime Kigel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime Kigel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime Kigel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime Kigel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime Kigel. The network helps show where Jaime Kigel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaime Kigel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaime Kigel Line = papers co-authored together Jaime Kigel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000284
2 2002213
3 2005212
4 1992190
5 1995163
6 1994153
7 2010136
8 2014124
9 2004124
10 2003113
11 200391
12 199382
13 199182
14 200971
15 201367
16 200965
17 200064
18 198161
19 199160
20 199759

About Jaime Kigel

Jaime Kigel is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 115 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (44 papers), Plant and animal studies (22 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (14 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (13 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (11 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (11 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (10 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.6k citations), Forestry (402 citations), Plant Science (2.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (988 citations) and Ecological Modeling (217 citations). Jaime Kigel has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Avi Perevolotsky, Marcelo Sternberg, Yagil Osem, Micha Ofir, Mario Gutman, Yaacov Okon, Eugene D. Ungar, Katja Tielbörger, Carly Golodets and James Aronson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vegetation Science, Annals of Botany, Physiologia Plantarum, Scientia Horticulturae and Oecologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact