Jacques Koolen
Impact in
- Surgery top 0.05%
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
-
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Papers in
- Surgery 159
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics 134
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy 19
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques 12
-
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 9
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments 8
- Heart rate and cardiovascular health 5
- Co-authors
- Bernard De Bruyne (34 shared papers)Nico H.J. Pijls (27 shared papers)Hans J. R. M. Bonnier (17 shared papers)Jozef Bartúnek (7 shared papers)Kathinka H. Peels (10 shared papers)Pepijn H. van der Voort (1 shared paper)William C. Wijns (9 shared papers)Jan C.A. Hoorntje (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (21 papers)JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions (15 papers)EuroIntervention (12 papers)The American Journal of Cardiology (11 papers)European Heart Journal (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jacques Koolen
180 papers receiving 12.4k citations
Jacques Koolen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Surgery 9.8k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.8k
- Biomaterials 940
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.5k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 84
Countries citing papers authored by Jacques Koolen
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacques Koolen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacques Koolen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacques Koolen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacques Koolen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacques Koolen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacques Koolen. The network helps show where Jacques Koolen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacques Koolen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 184 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenoses Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 1808 |
| 2 | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Nonsignificant Stenosis Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1200 |
| 3 | Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 774 |
| 4 | Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary Stenosis Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 707 |
| 5 | Predictors of Coronary Stent Thrombosis Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 563 |
| 6 | Evaluation of the Second Generation of a Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 463 |
| 7 | Safety and performance of the drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS) in patients with de-novo coronary lesions: 12 month results of the prospective, multicentre, first-in-man BIOSOLVE-I trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 368 |
| 8 | Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With STEMI Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 289 |
| 9 | 2010 | 270 | |
| 10 | European perspective in the recanalisation of Chronic Total Occlusions (CTO): consensus document from the EuroCTO Club. | 2007 | 238 |
| 11 | 2000 | 223 | |
| 12 | Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 216 |
| 13 | 2014 | 206 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 199 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 180 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 176 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 149 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 139 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 136 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 133 |
About Jacques Koolen
Jacques Koolen is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 184 papers that have together received 13.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (134 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (19 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (17 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (12 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (9 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Heart rate and cardiovascular health (5 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (9.8k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.8k citations), Biomaterials (940 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.5k citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (84 citations). Jacques Koolen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernard De Bruyne, Nico H.J. Pijls, Hans J. R. M. Bonnier, Jozef Bartúnek, Kathinka H. Peels, Pepijn H. van der Voort, William C. Wijns, Jan C.A. Hoorntje, G. Jan Willem Bech and Patrick W.J.C. Serruys. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, EuroIntervention, The American Journal of Cardiology and European Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.