Jack N. Cederquist

533 citations
33 papers · 385 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jack N. Cederquist

31 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Jack N. Cederquist
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Media Technology 118
  • Structural Biology 15
  • Radiation 84
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 195
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 111
Replace John B. DeVelis with:
John B. DeVelis United States
A. Boivin Canada
D. Scott Acton United States
W. Duane Montgomery United States
D. A. Fish United Kingdom
Igor Shevkunov Finland
Samuel Pinilla Colombia
V. P. Sivokon Russia
Ning Zhou China
Klaus Mantel Germany
Jack N. Cederquist relative to John B. DeVelis United States John B. DeVelis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John B. DeVelis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack N. Cederquist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack N. Cederquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack N. Cederquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack N. Cederquist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack N. Cederquist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack N. Cederquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack N. Cederquist. The network helps show where Jack N. Cederquist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jack N. Cederquist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack N. Cederquist Line = papers co-authored together Jack N. Cederquist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198960
2 198942
3 198439
4 198835
5 198722
6 199621
7 198018
8 199017
9 198717
10 199611
11 197910
12 199410
13 19918
14 19947
15 19997
16 19896
17 19866
18 19956
19 19816
20 19895

About Jack N. Cederquist

Jack N. Cederquist is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Media Technology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 33 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (13 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (9 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (9 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (9 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (7 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (6 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (6 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (118 citations), Structural Biology (15 citations), Radiation (84 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (195 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (111 citations). Jack N. Cederquist has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony M. Tai, Michael T. Eismann, C.C. Wackerman, James R. Fienup, Sing H. Lee, Craig R. Schwartz, Joseph C. Marron, Richard G. Paxman, J. A. Hackwell and John H. Seldin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optical Engineering, Applied Physics A, Optics Letters and Journal of the Optical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact