Jack Hansom

436 citations
9 papers · 329 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Hansom

9 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Jack Hansom
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 248
  • Artificial Intelligence 145
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 49
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 3
  • Computational Mechanics 34
Replace Natalie Kostinski with:
Natalie Kostinski United States
H. G. Barros Germany
Steve MacLean Canada
Wilhelmus M. Ruyten United States
Robert Polster United States
Robert B. Lobbia United States
Erik J. Bochove United States
N. F. Andreev Russia
Kenan Qu United States
Ilya Lyubomirsky United States
Jack Hansom relative to Natalie Kostinski United States Natalie Kostinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Natalie Kostinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Hansom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Hansom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Hansom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Hansom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Hansom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Hansom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Hansom. The network helps show where Jack Hansom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jack Hansom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Hansom Line = papers co-authored together Jack Hansom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201585
2 201376
3 201465
4 199050
5 201920
6 201419
7 199410
8 19893
9 19891

About Jack Hansom

Jack Hansom is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Mechanics of Materials and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (2 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (2 papers), Laser Design and Applications (2 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (2 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (2 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (248 citations), Artificial Intelligence (145 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (49 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 citations) and Computational Mechanics (34 citations). Jack Hansom has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Clemens Matthiesen, Claire Le Gall, Carsten H. H. Schulte, Mete Atatüre, Edmund Clarke, Maxime Hugues, Alex E. Jones, Jacob M. Taylor, M. Geller and P. A. Rosen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Physical Review B, Laser and Particle Beams, Nature and Nature Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact