Jack Freeman

931 citations
5 papers · 689 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Freeman

4 papers receiving 620 citations

Jack Freeman's Hit Papers

Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices 1987 · 648 citations
6480+13+26Years since publication200400600

Peers

Jack Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Instrumentation 61
  • Media Technology 114
  • Aerospace Engineering 237
  • Radiation 60
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 90
Replace Tom Elliott with:
Tom Elliott United States
Paul Jerram United Kingdom
Terrence S. Lomheim United States
Thomas J. Cunningham United States
G.R. Hopkinson United Kingdom
B. Turko United States
Peter Pool United Kingdom
C. G. Wynne United Kingdom
James P. Lavine United States
John R. Tower United States
Jack Freeman relative to Tom Elliott United States Tom Elliott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tom Elliott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Freeman. The network helps show where Jack Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jack Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Jack Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices
Hit paper breakdown →
1987648
2 198420
3 200913
4 20187
5
Scientific charge-coupled devices (Optical Engineering 1987)
19931

About Jack Freeman

Jack Freeman is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Ocean Engineering, having authored 5 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (2 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (2 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (2 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (1 paper), African history and culture analysis (1 paper), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (1 paper), Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition (1 paper) and Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (61 citations), Media Technology (114 citations), Aerospace Engineering (237 citations), Radiation (60 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (90 citations). Jack Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Tom Elliott, S. A. Collins, James R. Janesick, Morley M. Blouke, Zhaoyi Dai, Mason B. Tomson, Amy T. Kan, Nan Zhang, Darren D. Schmidt and T.S.J. Elliott. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Optical Engineering and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact