JA Smith

74 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

JA Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 200
  • Epidemiology 615
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 301
  • Surgery 534
  • Oncology 289
Replace Antje Habicht with:
Antje Habicht Germany
Richard W. Lieberman United States
Philip J. Katzman United States
Belur S. Bhagavan United States
Chen‐Chih J. Sun United States
Chih‐Wei Sung Taiwan
Nancy E. Warner United States
Willie A. Andersen United States
Francis E. Sharkey United States
C. Elie France
JA Smith relative to Antje Habicht Germany Antje Habicht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Antje Habicht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by JA Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JA Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JA Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JA Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JA Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JA Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JA Smith. The network helps show where JA Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside JA Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with JA Smith Line = papers co-authored together JA Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994142
2 1985110
3 1992109
4 1988103
5 1997103
6 199087
7 200286
8 199965
9 199264
10 200863
11
Anal human papillomavirus infection and squamous neoplasia in patients with invasive vulvar cancer.
199448
12 199145
13 199141
14 199441
15 199136
16 198933
17 198733
18 199233
19
In vitro studies of uterine electrosurgery.
199132
20 199232

About JA Smith

JA Smith is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (21 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (9 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (7 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (200 citations), Epidemiology (615 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (301 citations), Surgery (534 citations) and Oncology (289 citations). JA Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include F. Sharp, Kenneth Rogers, Simon S. Cross, Roger D. Start, J H Scholefield, Geoffrey S. Dawes, O A Ogunbiyi, Christopher W.G. Redman, Joanna Girling and Eleanor Dow. Their work appears in journals such as Cytopathology, Journal of Clinical Pathology, British journal of surgery, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact