JA Silva

577 citations
34 papers · 436 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

JA Silva

30 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

JA Silva
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Clinical Psychology 207
  • Biotechnology 44
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 79
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 52
  • Philosophy 33
Replace S. Visser with:
S. Visser Netherlands
Manuel Sánchez de Miguél Spain
Mónica Hernández López Spain
Helen Tyrer United Kingdom
William Whitfield United Kingdom
Jamieson B. Hurry United Kingdom
Suaad Moussa Egypt
Christopher Cordess United Kingdom
Isabel Brandão Portugal
Katrina C. Johnson United States
JA Silva relative to S. Visser Netherlands S. Visser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
S. Visser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by JA Silva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JA Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JA Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JA Silva more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JA Silva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JA Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JA Silva. The network helps show where JA Silva may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside JA Silva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with JA Silva Line = papers co-authored together JA Silva links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200776
2 200268
3 200140
4
Capgras syndrome and dangerousness.
198940
5 200326
6 199818
7 200018
8 199715
9 200015
10 199515
11 199912
12 199611
13 199111
14
Survey of forensic psychiatrists on evaluation and treatment of prisoners on death row.
200010
15 19989
16 19919
17 19917
18 19937
19 19957
20 19945

About JA Silva

JA Silva is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 34 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (207 citations), Biotechnology (44 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (79 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (52 citations) and Philosophy (33 citations). JA Silva has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include GB Leong, Robert Weinstock, Gregory B. Leong, Nelsón Durán, Hiromu Aoyama, Sérgio Marangoni, Domenico Rotilio, Clara Sá-Miranda, Spencer Eth and Ronald L. Klein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Hypertension, Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, Intensive Care Medicine and AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact