J. Schmidt

841 citations
70 papers · 704 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J. Schmidt

62 papers receiving 680 citations

Peers

J. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 394
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 477
  • Water Science and Technology 93
  • Mechanics of Materials 115
  • Computational Mechanics 91
Replace Chobei Yamabe with:
Chobei Yamabe Japan
Satoshi Ihara Japan
L.A. Rosocha United States
Pascal Boubert France
Reetesh Kumar Gangwar India
M. I. Taktakishvili Russia
P. Thomas United States
É. M. Barkhudarov Russia
F. Pontiga Spain
Shurik Yatom United States
J. Schmidt relative to Chobei Yamabe Japan Chobei Yamabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Chobei Yamabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Schmidt. The network helps show where J. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together J. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999370
2 200732
3 202024
4 202117
5 200515
6 201013
7 200813
8 200213
9 200812
10 201112
11 202012
12 202011
13 202110
14 20068
15 20158
16 20067
17 20047
18 20146
19 20116
20 20136

About J. Schmidt

J. Schmidt is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (19 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (18 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (16 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (16 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (14 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (13 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (12 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (394 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (477 citations), Water Science and Technology (93 citations), Mechanics of Materials (115 citations) and Computational Mechanics (91 citations). J. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Russia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Milan Šimek, P. Šunka, M. Člupek, V. Babický, Petr Lukeš, Mirko Černák, V. Prukner, K. Koláček, Petr Hoffer and Christophe Leys. Their work appears in journals such as Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Laser and Particle Beams, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact