J. Mitchell

2.2k citations
40 papers · 736 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

J. Mitchell

35 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers

J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Clinical Psychology 106
  • Leadership and Management 6
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 16
  • Hematology 47
  • General Health Professions 99
Replace Kathleen Schell with:
Kathleen Schell United States
Anna Kirstine Larsen Denmark
Christine Garcia United States
César A. Rodríguez Spain
Victoria Goldberg Argentina
Constance Holman Australia
Kate M. Brody Australia
Patricia Henderson United States
Michele C. Hayward United States
Stefan N. Symeonides United Kingdom
J. Mitchell relative to Kathleen Schell United States Kathleen Schell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Kathleen Schell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Mitchell. The network helps show where J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013133
2 1982112
3 201899
4 201386
5 200544
6 201140
7 197035
8 201133
9 196629
10 197321
11 200215
12 200210
13 200310
14 19649
15 19829
16 20048
17 20047
18
Use of droperidol and fentanyl for analgesia and sedation in primates.
19666
19 19615
20 19563

About J. Mitchell

J. Mitchell is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation, Biomedical Engineering and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 40 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (106 citations), Leadership and Management (6 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations), Hematology (47 citations) and General Health Professions (99 citations). J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Barbosa, Cheryl Zlotnick, Suzanne Cory, S Gerondakis, Elizabeth Webb, Olivier Bernard, Jerry M. Adams, J. M. Yochim, Pamela Pierce Palmer and Lynn Bennie. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Science and Engineering, Inflammation Research, Neuroendocrinology, British Journal of Cancer and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact