J. MacMahon

551 citations
17 papers · 408 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

J. MacMahon

16 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

J. MacMahon
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 248
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 22
  • Physiology 66
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 54
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
Replace Jo Congleton with:
Jo Congleton United Kingdom
Ivar Ellingsen Norway
María Tereza Aguiar Pessoa Morano Brazil
M Tobiasz Poland
Patrick Muggensturm Switzerland
Emilia Sawicka Poland
Norbert Metzdorf Germany
Roberto Walter Dal Negro Italy
Marie-Louise M. Coussa-Koniski Lebanon
Buist As United States
J. MacMahon relative to Jo Congleton United Kingdom Jo Congleton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Jo Congleton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. MacMahon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. MacMahon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. MacMahon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. MacMahon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. MacMahon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. MacMahon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. MacMahon. The network helps show where J. MacMahon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. MacMahon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. MacMahon Line = papers co-authored together J. MacMahon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery
2005112
2 200772
3 200551
4 199834
5 199629
6 199325
7 199416
8 199915
9 200814
10 200512
11 19559
12 19958
13 20065
14 20064
15
Knowledge and self-efficacy questionnaires in COPD: a review
20101
16
Lung cancer survival in Northern Ireland.
20031
17 20210

About J. MacMahon

J. MacMahon is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 17 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper) and Human Health and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (248 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (22 citations), Physiology (66 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (54 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations). J. MacMahon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include J.S. Elborn, Judy Bradley, Brenda O’Neill, Liam G. Heaney, Toby J Lasserson, R.M. Rudd, Daniel F. McAuley, M F Muers, Richard D. Page and Paul Plant. Their work appears in journals such as Thorax, International Journal of Clinical Practice, European Journal of Epidemiology, CHEST Journal and QJM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact