J. M. Lock

1.3k citations
67 papers · 982 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

J. M. Lock

59 papers receiving 797 citations

Peers

J. M. Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Forestry 98
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 266
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 353
  • Ecology 282
  • Ecological Modeling 44
Replace Paul Isenmann with:
Paul Isenmann France
K. Greg Murray United States
Fernando Biganzoli Argentina
Sérgio de Faria Lopes Brazil
Sergio Vílchez Costa Rica
Javier Laborde Mexico
Fernando Cornejo Valverde United States
John W. Menke United States
Caleb E. Gordon United States
Fred W. Stauffer Switzerland
J. M. Lock relative to Paul Isenmann France Paul Isenmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Paul Isenmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Lock. The network helps show where J. M. Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. M. Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. M. Lock Line = papers co-authored together J. M. Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199292
2 199591
3 197287
4 199973
5
Legumes of West Asia : a check list
200060
6 200160
7 201454
8 199044
9 199329
10 201628
11 201223
12 200221
13 199920
14 197519
15 198815
16
Effects of fishing pressure on the fish resources of the Port Moresby barrier and fringing reefs
198614
17 199014
18 198913
19 197712
20 200112

About J. M. Lock

J. M. Lock is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Forestry, Ecology and Pharmacology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African Botany and Ecology Studies (21 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (9 papers), Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (7 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers) and Agricultural pest management studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (98 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (266 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (353 citations), Ecology (282 citations) and Ecological Modeling (44 citations). J. M. Lock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include J. S. Rodwell, Katherine Simpson, Alan J. A. Stewart, Christopher Preston, D. F. Cutler, Brian Schrire, C. R. Huxley, Elmar Robbrecht, P. Short and I. D. Cowie. Their work appears in journals such as Kew Bulletin, Evolutionary ecology research, Molecular Ecology Resources, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics and Journal of Bryology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact