J. Lega

67 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

J. Lega
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 839
  • Computer Networks and Communications 1.5k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 426
  • Modeling and Simulation 109
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 656
Replace P. Borckmans with:
P. Borckmans Belgium
G. Dewel Belgium
Walter Zimmermann Germany
D. Walgraef Belgium
John C. Neu United States
Jaume Casademunt Spain
Marcel G. Clerc Chile
Christian Elphick Chile
Cyrill B. Muratov United States
Wolfram Just Germany
J. Lega relative to P. Borckmans Belgium P. Borckmans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
P. Borckmans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Lega

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Lega's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Lega with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Lega more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Lega

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Lega. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Lega. The network helps show where J. Lega may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Lega, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Lega Line = papers co-authored together J. Lega links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989321
2 1990271
3 1994244
4 1993215
5 1990143
6 200283
7 198780
8 199077
9 199569
10 199467
11 198955
12 200354
13 198853
14 200153
15 199446
16 201741
17 199733
18 199133
19 199229
20 201929

About J. Lega

J. Lega is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (29 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (9 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (9 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (8 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (8 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (5 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (839 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (1.5k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (426 citations), Modeling and Simulation (109 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (656 citations). J. Lega has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P. Coullet, L. Gil, Jerome V. Moloney, Alan C. Newell, T. Passot, J. Lajzérowicz, Heidi E. Brown, E. Pampaloni, C. Pérez‐García and S. Ciliberto. Their work appears in journals such as Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A, Journal of Medical Entomology and SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact