J. Klem

9.7k citations
18 papers · 81 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

J. Klem

16 papers receiving 76 citations

Peers

J. Klem
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Structural Biology 11
  • Condensed Matter Physics 42
  • Radiation 19
  • Information Systems and Management 12
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 18
Replace A. T. Doyle with:
A. T. Doyle United Kingdom
L. Silvestris Italy
H. Wolters Portugal
O. Hartmann Germany
R. Tanaka Japan
A. Perazzo United States
F. Salvatore United Kingdom
David Rohr Germany
E. Crescio Italy
M. Pesaresi United Kingdom
J. Klem relative to A. T. Doyle United Kingdom A. T. Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
A. T. Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Klem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Klem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Klem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Klem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Klem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Klem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Klem. The network helps show where J. Klem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Klem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Klem Line = papers co-authored together J. Klem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199633
2 20098
3 20107
4 20106
5 19984
6 20084
7 20094
8 20023
9 20023
10
What did we learn from the extraction experiments with bent crystals at the CERN SPS
19982
11
Proton extraction from a high-energy beam with bent crystals
19982
12
Energy Dependence of Crystal Assisted Extraction at the CERN SPS
19971
13 20101
14 20111
15 20021
16 20021
17
MULTITURN MEASUREMENTS AT THE CERN SPS
20000
18 20020

About J. Klem

J. Klem is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 81 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena (8 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (7 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (6 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers) and Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (11 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (42 citations), Radiation (19 citations), Information Systems and Management (12 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (18 citations). J. Klem has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include W. Herr, E. Weisse, K. Elsener, G. Fidecaro, U. Mikkelsen, G. Vuagnin, S. P. Møller, E. Uggerhøj, Ari‐Pekka Hameri and G. Arduini. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Physics Letters B, Lecture notes in computer science, Journal of Physics Conference Series and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact