J. E. Williams

10 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers

J. E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Drug Discovery 3
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 96
  • Economics and Econometrics 204
  • Parasitology 40
  • Paleontology 35
Replace R. Mansell Prothero with:
R. Mansell Prothero United Kingdom
John Black United Kingdom
Larry Sawers United States
J. W. F. Rowe United States
Julie K. Smith United States
Charles M. Good United States
Ashok Κ. Dutt United States
Sukhan Jackson Australia
Andrew Cassels Switzerland
Kris Inwood Canada
J. E. Williams relative to R. Mansell Prothero United Kingdom R. Mansell Prothero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
R. Mansell Prothero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Williams. The network helps show where J. E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together J. E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2000226
2 1973221
3 1997108
4 197750
5
Cancer screening intervention among black women in inner-city Atlanta--design of a study.
199247
6 196322
7 197121
8 196311
9 198410
10
Sex stereotypes in Portugal and Singapore
19897
11 19571
12 19761
13 19711
14 19610

About J. E. Williams

J. E. Williams is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and History, having authored 14 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Archaeology and Natural History (1 paper), Geological formations and processes (1 paper) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Drug Discovery (3 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (96 citations), Economics and Econometrics (204 citations), Parasitology (40 citations) and Paleontology (35 citations). J. E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Charles H. Feinstein, John F. C. Sung, Daniel S. Blumenthal, Ralph J. Coates, Jonathan M. Liff, Ernest Alema‐Mensah, Philip N. Jones, R. Neves, Bernard Owens and Raymond S. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, British Journal of Sociology and International Review of Social History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact