J. E. Goldston
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 1
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 1
-
- Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems 1
- Co-authors
- G. Ricker (1 shared paper)R. Schödel (1 shared paper)T. Viehmann (1 shared paper)G. P. Garmire (1 shared paper)A. Eckart (1 shared paper)Geoffrey C. Bower (1 shared paper)Frederick K. Baganoff (1 shared paper)C. Straubmeier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Astronomy and Astrophysics (1 paper)Review of Scientific Instruments (1 paper)American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
J. E. Goldston
3 papers receiving 109 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 110
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 44
- Geophysics 17
- Biomedical Engineering 20
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 7
Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Goldston
This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Goldston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Goldston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Goldston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Goldston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Goldston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Goldston. The network helps show where J. E. Goldston may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Goldston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 109 | |
| 2 | GALFA Hardware and Calibration Techniques | 2004 | 1 |
| 3 | 1995 | 1 |
About J. E. Goldston
J. E. Goldston is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computer Networks and Communications, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 3 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (1 paper), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (1 paper), Particle Detector Development and Performance (1 paper), Magnetic confinement fusion research (1 paper), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (1 paper) and Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (110 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (44 citations), Geophysics (17 citations), Biomedical Engineering (20 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (7 citations). J. E. Goldston has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G. Ricker, R. Schödel, T. Viehmann, G. P. Garmire, A. Eckart, Geoffrey C. Bower, Frederick K. Baganoff, C. Straubmeier, M. W. Bautz and M. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Review of Scientific Instruments and American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.