J. E. Adams

1.2k citations
40 papers · 960 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

J. E. Adams

39 papers receiving 877 citations

Peers

J. E. Adams
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 323
  • Nephrology 63
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 97
  • Infectious Diseases 94
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 83
Replace Thomas L. Kelly with:
Thomas L. Kelly United States
Scott Wilson United Kingdom
Paul Mahoney United States
Anne‐Sophie Julien Canada
David S. David United States
Lauren A. Burt Canada
Piotr Adamczyk Poland
F Camerini Italy
N. Bergaoui Tunisia
Felix Aberer Austria
J. E. Adams relative to Thomas L. Kelly United States Thomas L. Kelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.7×
Thomas L. Kelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Adams. The network helps show where J. E. Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Adams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. E. Adams Line = papers co-authored together J. E. Adams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011203
2 200699
3 199671
4 199465
5 200064
6 199160
7 196046
8 199338
9 197737
10
Fibromyalgia: a risk factor for osteoporosis.
199933
11 198629
12 199024
13 198824
14 198521
15 198820
16 198020
17 201518
18 198816
19
Isometric progressive resistive exercise for osteoporosis.
200012
20 19938

About J. E. Adams

J. E. Adams is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Nephrology, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 40 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (6 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Bone health and treatments (3 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (2 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers) and Dental Radiography and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (323 citations), Nephrology (63 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (97 citations), Infectious Diseases (94 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (83 citations). J. E. Adams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Davies, E. Michael Lewiecki, Alireza Moayyeri, M Krieg, Robert A. Adler, Juliet Compston, Didier Hans, G. L. O’Neill, R.A. Bowman and Robert L. Swezey. Their work appears in journals such as Bone, Clinical Endocrinology, Clinical Radiology, Epidemiology and Infection and Postgraduate Medical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact