J. Denoth

2.0k citations
43 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

J. Denoth

43 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

J. Denoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 561
  • Equine 69
  • Biomedical Engineering 775
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 218
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 262
Replace Emma Hodson‐Tole with:
Emma Hodson‐Tole United Kingdom
W. Brent Edwards Canada
A. C. Vailas United States
A. Huson Netherlands
Matthew C. Morrissey United Kingdom
J.P. Micallef France
Gary L. Smidt United States
Ejnar Eriksson Sweden
Christoph Anders Germany
R. Stoeckart Netherlands
J. Denoth relative to Emma Hodson‐Tole United Kingdom Emma Hodson‐Tole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Emma Hodson‐Tole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Denoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Denoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Denoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Denoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Denoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Denoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Denoth. The network helps show where J. Denoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Denoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Denoth Line = papers co-authored together J. Denoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004264
2 2000180
3 1998139
4 2005119
5 2005102
6 200686
7 200185
8 200273
9 198868
10 200463
11 200246
12 200040
13 200739
14 198736
15 200230
16 200929
17
Influence of hip and knee joint angles on excitation of knee extensor muscles.
199428
18 200323
19 198721
20 198518

About J. Denoth

J. Denoth is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (13 papers), Sports Performance and Training (10 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (9 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (8 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (7 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (5 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (561 citations), Equine (69 citations), Biomedical Engineering (775 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (218 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (262 citations). J. Denoth has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include E. Stüssi, Angela Frotzler, Prisca Eser, Alex Stacoff, Ivo A. Telley, H. Schießl, C. Reinschmidt, Antonie J. van den Bogert, Benno M. Nigg and Hans Knecht. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, European Journal of Applied Physiology, The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Psychophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact