J. Christopher Soper

787 citations
23 papers · 385 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

J. Christopher Soper

20 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

J. Christopher Soper
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Sociology and Political Science 325
  • Political Science and International Relations 144
  • Law 34
  • Religious studies 16
  • Health 22
Replace Marion Maddox with:
Marion Maddox Australia
Adis Duderija Australia
Luke Bretherton United States
Recep Şentürk Türkiye
Lina Molokotos-Liederman United Kingdom
Gisela Webb United States
Jean‐Paul Willaime France
Scott Appleby United States
Irena Borowik Poland
Vyacheslav Karpov United States
J. Christopher Soper relative to Marion Maddox Australia Marion Maddox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Marion Maddox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Christopher Soper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Christopher Soper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Christopher Soper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Christopher Soper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Christopher Soper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Christopher Soper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Christopher Soper. The network helps show where J. Christopher Soper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside J. Christopher Soper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Christopher Soper Line = papers co-authored together J. Christopher Soper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200486
2 199978
3 200367
4 200742
5
Muslims and the State in Britain 2001
200130
6 200725
7 199413
8 20068
9 20187
10 20105
11 20015
12 20034
13 20123
14 20112
15 20232
16 19942
17 20221
18 20231
19 19951
20 20061

About J. Christopher Soper

J. Christopher Soper is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Ocean Engineering, Social Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (9 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (8 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (3 papers), Marine and Coastal Research (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (325 citations), Political Science and International Relations (144 citations), Law (34 citations), Religious studies (16 citations) and Health (22 citations). J. Christopher Soper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Joel S. Fetzer, Stephen V. Monsma, James L. Guth, Brian Veitch, Jennifer S. Smith, E. Veitch and Jonathan D. Power. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Journal of Law and Religion, French Politics, Review of Policy Research and Politics and Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact