J. C. Garrison

2.1k citations
56 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

J. C. Garrison

55 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

J. C. Garrison
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 49
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 259
  • Artificial Intelligence 427
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 158
Replace G. I. Opat with:
G. I. Opat Australia
Rajendra Bhandari India
Kirk W. Madison Canada
M. Razavy Canada
C. Bamber United States
Victor Gurarie United States
Michael Bishof United States
J. T. M. Walraven Netherlands
Ashton S. Bradley New Zealand
Pierre Cladé France
J. C. Garrison relative to G. I. Opat Australia G. I. Opat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
G. I. Opat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. Garrison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. Garrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. Garrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. Garrison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. Garrison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. Garrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. Garrison. The network helps show where J. C. Garrison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. C. Garrison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. C. Garrison Line = papers co-authored together J. C. Garrison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988189
2 1996176
3 2008122
4 1970118
5 1993118
6 1994112
7 197378
8 199156
9 200452
10 198852
11 197643
12 199241
13 199234
14 199127
15 199625
16 197624
17 199123
18 199719
19 197718
20 199518

About J. C. Garrison

J. C. Garrison is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum optics and atomic interactions (16 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (14 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (10 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (8 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (4 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (49 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (259 citations), Artificial Intelligence (427 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (158 citations). J. C. Garrison has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. Y. Chiao, E. M. Wright, J. Wong, Eric L. Bolda, Ivan Deutsch, D. F. Walls, J. E. Swain, J. W. Shearer, A. M. Rubenchik and Michael D. Feit. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters A, Optics Communications and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact