Ivan Procházka

1.3k citations
134 papers · 798 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ivan Procházka

116 papers receiving 736 citations

Peers

Ivan Procházka
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Instrumentation 269
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 473
  • Ophthalmology 101
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 52
  • Aerospace Engineering 170
Replace Kevin D. Ridley with:
Kevin D. Ridley United Kingdom
Hiroo Kunimori Japan
Laura C. Sinclair United States
H. T. Yura United States
G. C. Gilbreath United States
P B Coates United Kingdom
J. Kovalik United States
Jean‐Marc Conan France
R. Jones India
H. R. Burris United States
Ivan Procházka relative to Kevin D. Ridley United Kingdom Kevin D. Ridley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Kevin D. Ridley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivan Procházka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan Procházka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan Procházka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan Procházka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan Procházka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan Procházka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan Procházka. The network helps show where Ivan Procházka may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ivan Procházka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivan Procházka Line = papers co-authored together Ivan Procházka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201862
2 201045
3 200444
4 201534
5 201228
6 201028
7 200725
8 200523
9 200821
10 201118
11 200718
12 199917
13 199716
14 201316
15 200916
16 201815
17 201115
18 201314
19 200914
20 201013

About Ivan Procházka

Ivan Procházka is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation, Ophthalmology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 134 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (58 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (46 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (27 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (23 papers), Laser Design and Applications (14 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (13 papers) and Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (269 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (473 citations), Ophthalmology (101 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (52 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (170 citations). Ivan Procházka has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jan Kodet, K. Hamal, Ulrich Schreiber, B. Sopko, Georg Kirchner, Wolfgang Schäfer, Hiroo Kunimori, Franz Koidl, Urs Hugentobler and L. Cacciapuoti. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Advances in Space Research, Journal of Modern Optics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Metrologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact