Ivan Oransky

1.1k citations
110 papers · 551 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ivan Oransky

86 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Ivan Oransky
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Safety Research 196
  • Information Systems and Management 98
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 85
  • History and Philosophy of Science 54
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Pauline Barbeau with:
Pauline Barbeau Canada
Sathya Amarasekara United States
Vivienne C. Bachelet Chile
Rebecca S. Starr United States
Wim Pinxten Belgium
Stephanie M. Swanberg United States
Tue Helms Andersen Denmark
Elizabeth M. Suelzer United States
Ella T. August United States
Lauge Neimann Rasmussen Denmark
Ivan Oransky relative to Pauline Barbeau Canada Pauline Barbeau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Pauline Barbeau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivan Oransky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan Oransky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan Oransky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan Oransky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan Oransky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan Oransky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan Oransky. The network helps show where Ivan Oransky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ivan Oransky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivan Oransky Line = papers co-authored together Ivan Oransky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201457
2 201748
3 201943
4 201841
5 202039
6 201123
7 200015
8 200313
9 200413
10 202213
11 202212
12 200311
13 201511
14 20039
15 20059
16 20179
17 20189
18 20168
19 20188
20 20057

About Ivan Oransky

Ivan Oransky is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History, Safety Research, Information Systems and Management and Neurology, having authored 110 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (46 papers), Biographical and Historical Analysis (23 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (17 papers), Medical History and Innovations (16 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (13 papers), Historical Medical Research and Treatments (8 papers), Medicine, History, and Philosophy (5 papers) and Publishing and Scholarly Communication (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (196 citations), Information Systems and Management (98 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (85 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (54 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Ivan Oransky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include C. Kristina Gunsalus, Alik M. Farber, Jeffrey A. Kalish, Jeffrey J. Siracuse, Teviah Erik Sachs, Elizabeth G. King, David Flynn, Isabelle Boutron, Romana Haneef and Gabriel Baron. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Lancet Neurology, The Lancet Oncology, Accountability in Research and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact