István Deák

72 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

István Deák
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Statistics and Probability 105
  • Political Science and International Relations 282
  • History 123
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 57
  • Numerical Analysis 39
Replace Richard J. Bolton with:
Richard J. Bolton United Kingdom
Preston King United Kingdom
Christoph Frei Canada
Edward W. Packel United States
D. J. Bartholomew
Maurice Robin United States
Albert K. Ando United States
Morton D. Davis United States
Rida Laraki France
Fuad Aleskerov Russia
István Deák relative to Richard J. Bolton United Kingdom Richard J. Bolton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.7×
Richard J. Bolton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by István Deák

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of István Deák's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by István Deák with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites István Deák more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by István Deák

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by István Deák. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by István Deák. The network helps show where István Deák may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside István Deák, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with István Deák Line = papers co-authored together István Deák links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198179
2 200072
3 198066
4 199056
5 199343
6 200232
7 200229
8 198627
9 200026
10 199025
11 201023
12 198821
13 198014
14 199114
15 197512
16 200311
17 201110
18 198110
19 199510
20 20069

About István Deák

István Deák is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability, Numerical Analysis, History and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 82 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (24 papers), European history and politics (12 papers), Central European national history (6 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (5 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers) and Numerical Methods and Algorithms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (105 citations), Political Science and International Relations (282 citations), History (123 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 citations) and Numerical Analysis (39 citations). István Deák has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Randolph L. Braham, William Alexander Jenks, Tamás Szántai, Horand I. Gassmann, Jan T. Gross, Tony R. Judt, Stanley H. Hoffmann, Bruce Jay Collings, László Lovász and Tibor T. Glant. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Annals of Operations Research, New York review of books/˜The œNew York review of books, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics and Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact