István Deák

63 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers

István Deák
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Statistics and Probability 83
  • Political Science and International Relations 221
  • History 78
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 40
  • Sociology and Political Science 210
Replace Richard J. Bolton with:
Richard J. Bolton United Kingdom
Preston King United Kingdom
Andrew W. Marshall United States
Michel Volle France
A. R. Bergstrom United Kingdom
Edward W. Packel United States
Christoph Frei Canada
Thomas A. Brown United States
D. J. Bartholomew
Fuad Aleskerov Russia
István Deák relative to Richard J. Bolton United Kingdom Richard J. Bolton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.7×
Richard J. Bolton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by István Deák

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of István Deák's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by István Deák with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites István Deák more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by István Deák

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by István Deák. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by István Deák. The network helps show where István Deák may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside István Deák, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with István Deák Line = papers co-authored together István Deák links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198167
2 200062
3 199047
4 200040
5 199336
6 200231
7 198030
8 200227
9 198623
10 200022
11 199020
12 201019
13 199112
14 200310
15 20119
16 20069
17 19818
18 19677
19 19867
20 19956

About István Deák

István Deák is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability, History and Applied Mathematics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (21 papers), European history and politics (11 papers), Central European national history (5 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (4 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (3 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (3 papers) and Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (83 citations), Political Science and International Relations (221 citations), History (78 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (40 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (210 citations). István Deák has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Randolph L. Braham, Tony Judt, Jan T. Gross, Horand I. Gassmann, Tamás Szántai, William A. Jenks, Stanley Hoffmann, Bruce Jay Collings, László Lovász and Ágota Schlammadinger. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Annals of Operations Research, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics and European Journal of Operational Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact