Irmgard Männlein‐Robert

698 citations
10 papers · 17 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 4
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
    • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 2
    • Philosophy and Historical Thought 1
Journals
Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen (1 paper)Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)Mohr Siebeck eBooks (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

Irmgard Männlein‐Robert

6 papers receiving 13 citations

Peers

Irmgard Männlein‐Robert
Comparison fields: 5 of 10
  • Anthropology 12
  • Archeology 11
  • Religious studies 5
  • Philosophy 7
  • Classics 1
Replace Joseph A. Howley with:
Joseph A. Howley United States
Franz Cumont
Jean‐François Pradeau France
Gabriella Pironti France
Christopher Whitton United States
Sophia Aneziri Greece
Cristina Viano France
Dimitri Kasprzyk France
A. E. Housman United States
Julye Bidmead
Irmgard Männlein‐Robert relative to Joseph A. Howley United States Joseph A. Howley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Joseph A. Howley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Irmgard Männlein‐Robert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Irmgard Männlein‐Robert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irmgard Männlein‐Robert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irmgard Männlein‐Robert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Irmgard Männlein‐Robert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irmgard Männlein‐Robert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irmgard Männlein‐Robert. The network helps show where Irmgard Männlein‐Robert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Irmgard Männlein‐Robert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Irmgard Männlein‐Robert Line = papers co-authored together Irmgard Männlein‐Robert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown

About Irmgard Männlein‐Robert

Irmgard Männlein‐Robert is a scholar working on Archeology, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Classics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 17 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), Religion, Theology, and Education (1 paper), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper) and Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (12 citations), Archeology (11 citations), Religious studies (5 citations), Philosophy (7 citations) and Classics (1 citation). Frequent co-authors include Michael Erler and Christoph Riedweg. Their work appears in journals such as Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen, Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja), Medical Entomology and Zoology and Mohr Siebeck eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact