Iris Leng

26 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Iris Leng
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Modeling and Simulation 42
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 151
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 40
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 77
Replace Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto with:
Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto Brazil
Laura Moreno‐Galarraga Spain
Quentin Dercon United Kingdom
Megan Young United Kingdom
Toby Hillman United Kingdom
Asger Sand Paludan‐Müller Denmark
Felipe Machado Brazil
Esen Savaş Türkiye
Harry Crook United Kingdom
Maarten Van Herck Netherlands
Iris Leng relative to Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto Brazil Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×57×
Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iris Leng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Leng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Leng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Leng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iris Leng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Leng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Leng. The network helps show where Iris Leng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iris Leng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iris Leng Line = papers co-authored together Iris Leng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013172
2 201180
3 201679
4 201333
5 201528
6 201325
7 200824
8 201523
9 201018
10 202118
11 202116
12 201816
13 201615
14 202214
15 201613
16 20229
17 20216
18 20244
19 20194
20 20213

About Iris Leng

Iris Leng is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (42 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (151 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (40 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (77 citations). Iris Leng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Werner Bischoff, Katrina Swett, Timothy R. Peters, Thomas A. Arcury, C. Randall Clinch, Barbara J. Nicklas, Joseph G. Grzywacz, Rebecca Stephens, Mary F. Lyles and Michael E. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Contemporary Clinical Trials, Innovation in Aging and Experimental Gerontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact