In‐Gyu Kim

61 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

In‐Gyu Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Safety Research 148
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Management Science and Operations Research 127
  • Hepatology 65
  • Economics and Econometrics 158
Replace Robert Obermaier with:
Robert Obermaier Germany
Yuxuan Wu China
Patrick A. Thompson United States
Ariel Katz Canada
István Takács Hungary
Yuxiang Ye China
Tore Pedersen Norway
Luyao Shen United States
Luyu Yang China
In‐Gyu Kim relative to Robert Obermaier Germany Robert Obermaier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×49.3×
Robert Obermaier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by In‐Gyu Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In‐Gyu Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In‐Gyu Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In‐Gyu Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by In‐Gyu Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by In‐Gyu Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by In‐Gyu Kim. The network helps show where In‐Gyu Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside In‐Gyu Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with In‐Gyu Kim Line = papers co-authored together In‐Gyu Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201495
2 200173
3 199971
4 200861
5 199755
6 201048
7 201437
8 201136
9 199832
10 201125
11 200725
12 200118
13 201917
14 201216
15 200715
16 200515
17 201414
18 201013
19 202013
20 201312

About In‐Gyu Kim

In‐Gyu Kim is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Building and Construction and Safety Research, having authored 68 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Structural Load-Bearing Analysis (8 papers), Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete (8 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis (5 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (5 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (5 papers) and Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (148 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (127 citations), Hepatology (65 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (158 citations). In‐Gyu Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Kyung Hwan Baik, Jai-Il Youn, Jeong‐Soo Park, Dong‐Youn Lee, Chul-Hun Chung, Yukinori Koyama, Hsiao‐Yen Ma, Jun Xu, Tatiana Kisseleva and Jang Yong Jeon. Their work appears in journals such as Economics Letters, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, International Review of Law and Economics, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques and Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact