Ingo Jacobs

593 citations
25 papers · 425 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ingo Jacobs

25 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Ingo Jacobs
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Clinical Psychology 159
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 49
  • Social Psychology 108
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 32
Replace David Pina with:
David Pina Spain
Esteban Puente-López Spain
Joanna Dymecka Poland
Óscar Armando Esparza Del Villar Mexico
María del Carmen Neipp López Spain
Jiří Mareš Czechia
Karren E. Kowalski United States
Agnieszka Mościcka-Teske Poland
Magali Coldefy France
Arcadio Erlicher Italy
Ingo Jacobs relative to David Pina Spain David Pina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
David Pina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Jacobs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Jacobs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Jacobs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Jacobs. The network helps show where Ingo Jacobs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Jacobs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo Jacobs Line = papers co-authored together Ingo Jacobs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200554
2 201654
3 202140
4 201936
5 201430
6 201726
7 201525
8 201925
9 201624
10 201922
11
RELIABILITY OF ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES AS A FUNCTION OF TESTING FREQUENCY.
196818
12 197014
13 202111
14 20136
15 20196
16 19575
17 20155
18 20165
19 20185
20 20074

About Ingo Jacobs

Ingo Jacobs is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (5 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers) and Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (159 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (49 citations), Social Psychology (108 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (32 citations). Ingo Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Antje Horsch, Wolfgang Schöll, Julia Zimmermann, Kirstie McKenzie‐McHarg, Jardena J. Puder, Pedro Manuel Marques-Vidal, Ulrike Ehlert, Ayala Borghini, Yvan Vial and Chantal Martin-Söelch. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Frontiers in Psychiatry, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Personality Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact