Ingo Bruder
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
-
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Papers in
- Epidemiology 11
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management 9
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 2
-
- Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging 5
- Optical Coherence Tomography Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Peter A. Ringleb (10 shared papers)Christoph Gumbinger (10 shared papers)Björn Reuter (10 shared papers)Michael G. Hennerici (7 shared papers)Werner Hacke (7 shared papers)Rolf Kern (8 shared papers)H. Wiethölter (6 shared papers)Tamara Sauer (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Neurology (3 papers)Neurology (2 papers)European Journal of Neurology (2 papers)Der Ophthalmologe (2 papers)BMC Neurology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Ingo Bruder
20 papers receiving 258 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Rehabilitation 39
- Epidemiology 145
- Internal Medicine 9
- Neurology 29
- Emergency Medicine 12
Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Bruder
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Bruder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Bruder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Bruder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Bruder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Bruder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Bruder. The network helps show where Ingo Bruder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Bruder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 1 |
About Ingo Bruder
Ingo Bruder is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 22 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (9 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (39 citations), Epidemiology (145 citations), Internal Medicine (9 citations), Neurology (29 citations) and Emergency Medicine (12 citations). Ingo Bruder has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Ringleb, Christoph Gumbinger, Björn Reuter, Michael G. Hennerici, Werner Hacke, Rolf Kern, H. Wiethölter, Tamara Sauer, Christian Stock and Roland Hentschel. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Neurology, Neurology, European Journal of Neurology, Der Ophthalmologe and BMC Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.